Looks like the mutual fund industry is getting their way:
From MarketWatch: "By a vote of 5 to 0, members of the Securities and Exchange Commission proposed increasing the minimum amount to buy into a hedge fund to $2.5 million -- excluding real estate holdings. It's the first change since 1982, when investors were told to have a $1 million net worth or a $200,000 annual income."
By passing this proposal, the SEC basically eliminated about 98% of the general public having the opportunity to invest in hedge funds (aka limited partnerships or private investment funds). The amount of financial savvy or the ability to sustain a blow to the portfolio does not change dramatically when upping the minimum from $1m to $2.5m. A buy-and-hold strategy in the wrong stocks (i.e. dot-bomb) is still going to drive the investor into the poor house, yet we haven't put in place limits on who can get an on-line account and buy stocks or what types of stocks they can buy (except for certain risky stocks on margin).
To the casual observer, the mutual fund industry appears to feel threatened by the exponential growth of hedge funds and with no slowing down in sight, the mutual fund industry probably considers the alternative asset industry a viable threat to take away future dollars (and therefore future earnings and profitability).
Yes, this sounds a bit 'conspiracy theorist' but it is interesting that this is the first major change since 1982, and with the recent natural gas implosions of several hedge funds, it might be better to look at the funds themselves and not at the type of investor that can participate.
Also, if the SEC is so concerned about protecting the little guy (of course, the 'little guy' has a few million bucks to help ease his pain) why doesn't the SEC show the same type of interest and compassion towards the institutional investors that have been flooding the hedge funds with cash. What about the poor little liberal arts college that invests a huge % of its endowment into Mother Rock or Amaranth? Or the union? or the teachers' retirement plan?
Maybe more attention towards the basic holdings and strategies of the funds themselves may be a better way to protect the investor. Would Amaranth have melted down so dramatically if there was a way to monitor the crazy positions that Brian Hunter was amassing in natty gas futures?
Enough of the rant. If the proposal passes, it will slow the fund inflows slightly as the 'common man' will find it harder to invest, but since the majority of funds flowing to hedge funds come from institutions, it shouldn't slow the growth of the industry.
In the big scope of things, it limits the private investor who has a pretty good size portfolio from having access to certain alternative assets and the outsized and/or non-correlated returns that those asset classes can provide. And ultimately that is not good for the investor.
Happy weekend.
DJIA 12,445.52
NASDAQ 2,457.20
SP500 1,427.09
Labels: hedge funds, politics, SEC